Hi, The proposition I posted at 10th-Oct proposed to have a separate list to retain lesser paths not to expand the path_list length, but here are no comments by others at that time. Indeed, the latest patch has not been updated yet. Please wait for a few days. I'll refresh the patch again.
Thanks, 2020年1月11日(土) 11:01 Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com>: > > Hi, > > I wonder what is the status of this patch/thread. There was quite a bit > of discussion about possible approaches, but we currently don't have any > patch for review, AFAICS. Not sure what's the plan? > > So "needs review" status seems wrong, and considering we haven't seen > any patch since August (so in the past two CFs) I propose marking it as > returned with feedback. Any objections? > > FWIW I think we may well need a more elaborate logic which paths to > keep, but I'd prefer re-adding it back to the CF when we actually have a > new patch. > > regards > > -- > Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- HeteroDB, Inc / The PG-Strom Project KaiGai Kohei <kai...@heterodb.com>