On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:36 PM Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 6:31 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> writes: >> > So, I think v10 is a version of patch, which can be committed after >> > some cleanup. And we can try doing better nulls handling in a separate >> > patch. >> >> The cfbot reports that this doesn't pass regression testing. >> I haven't looked into why not. > > > Thank you for noticing. I'll take care of it.
In the v10 I've fixed a bug with nulls handling, but it appears that test contained wrong expected result. I've modified this test so that it directly compares sequential scan results with bitmap indexscan results. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
0001-Avoid-GIN-full-scan-for-empty-ALL-keys-v11.patch
Description: Binary data
