On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 8:02 PM Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== Source and destination overlap in
> memcpy(0x1000104, 0x1000104, 4)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== at 0x4C2E74D: memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14
> (vg_replace_strmem.c:1035)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0xA9A57B: qunique (qunique.h:34)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0xA9A843: InitCatalogCache (syscache.c:1056)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0xAB6B18: InitPostgres (postinit.c:682)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0x91F98E: PostgresMain (postgres.c:3909)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0x872DE9: BackendRun (postmaster.c:4498)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0x8725B3: BackendStartup (postmaster.c:4189)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0x86E7F4: ServerLoop (postmaster.c:1727)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0x86E0AA: PostmasterMain (postmaster.c:1400)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557== by 0x77CB56: main (main.c:210)
> ==00:00:00:28.322 1527557==
> {
> <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
> Memcheck:Overlap
> fun:memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14
> fun:qunique
> fun:InitCatalogCache
> fun:InitPostgres
> fun:PostgresMain
> fun:BackendRun
> fun:BackendStartup
> fun:ServerLoop
> fun:PostmasterMain
> fun:main
> }
>
> This is like the problem fixed in 9a9473f; the precedent from there would be
> to test src!=dst before calling mempcy(), e.g. as attached. I suppose the
> alternative would be to add a suppression like the one 9a9473f removed.
Thanks for fixing that.
> I do wonder why the Valgrind buildfarm animals haven't noticed.
Optimisation levels? For example, I see that skink is using -Og, at
which level my local GCC inlines qunique() and memcpy() so that in the
case you quoted there's a MOV instruction and valgrind has nothing to
complain about.
