On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 06:02:14AM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
On 1/6/20 8:37 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Hi,
This patch is currently in "needs review" state, but the last message is
from August 29, and my understanding is that there have been a couple of
objections / disagreements about the architecture, difficulties with
producing the set of syscalls, and not providing any built-in policy.
I don't think we're any closer to resolve those disagreements since
August, so I think we should make some decision about this patch,
instead of just moving it from one CF to the next one. The "needs
review" status seems not reflecting the situation.
Are there any plans to post a new version of the patch with a different
design, or something like that? If not, I propose we mark it either as
rejected or returned with feedback (and maybe get a new patch in the
future).
I assumed it was rejected.
I don't know. I still see it in the CF app with "needs review" status:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/2263/
Barring objections, I'll mark it as rejected.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
