On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 11:50 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So we're going to have to make some decisions about what range of > libedit builds we want to cater for in the tab-completion tests. > Given that the plan is to considerably increase the coverage of > those tests, I'm hesitant to promise that we'll keep passing with > anything that isn't explicitly tested in the buildfarm, or by active > developers such as yourself. Maybe that's fine given that end users > probably don't run the TAP tests.
This sounds similar to "EXTRA_TESTS=collate.linux.utf8". I think that it's fine to go that way, provided it isn't hard to work around. FWIW, I find it very surprising that it was possible for the test to fail on my workstation/server, without it failing on any buildfarm animals. -- Peter Geoghegan
