Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I vote for not trying to make this more complicated and just accepting > the original proposal. It's about a factor of ten increase over the > limit we have right now, which doesn't seem like enough to cause any > real breakage, and it should be enough to satisfy the majority of the > people who are unhappy with the current limit, and it is very little > work.
+1 ... we've surely beaten this topic to death by now.
regards, tom lane
