Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Sorry for letting this thread down for a couple of weeks, but I was
> hesitating to apply the last patch of the series as the cleanup of the
> code related to OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 is not that much. An extra
> argument in favor of the removal is that this can allow more shaving
> of past Python versions, as proposed by Peter here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/98b69261-298c-13d2-f34d-836fd9c29...@2ndquadrant.com
> So, let's do it.
FWIW, I'm not sure I see why there's a connection between moving up
the minimum Python version and minimum OpenSSL version. Nobody is
installing bleeding-edge Postgres on RHEL5, not even me ;-), so I
don't especially buy Peter's line of reasoning.
I'm perfectly okay with doing both things in HEAD, I just don't
see that doing one is an argument for or against doing the other.
regards, tom lane
