On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:11 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 1:25 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > What is the overhead here except the memory consumption? > > > > The time to copy those strings out of shared storage, any time > > you query pg_stat_activity. > > It seems like you're masterminding this, and I don't know why. It > seems unlikely that anyone will raise the value unless they have very > long queries, and if those people would rather pay the overhead of > copying more data than have their queries truncated, who are we to > argue? > +1 Cheers, Jeff
