Re: error context for vacuum to include block number

[Michael Paquier]

On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:27:12AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I named it so because it calls both lazy_vacuum_index
> ("PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE_VACUUM_INDEX") and
> lazy_vacuum_heap("PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE_VACUUM_HEAP")
> 
> I suppose you don't think the other way around is better?
> lazy_vacuum_index_heap

Dunno.  Let's see if others have other thoughts on the matter.  FWIW,
I have a long history at naming things in a way others don't like :)
--
Michael

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature