Hi, On 2019-12-11 12:11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I don't think you can make that conclusion. Perhaps the table once > needed a toast table because of some wide column that got dropped; > if so, it'd still have one. It'd be safer to look at > pg_class.reltoastrelid to verify existence (or not) of the toast relation.
That was checked in the email I was responding to. > It strikes me that there could easily be cases where a publisher table > has a toast relation and a subscriber's doesn't ... maybe this code > isn't expecting that? This code is all running on the publisher side, so I don't think it could matter. Greetings, Andres Freund
