On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:33 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Something new as of 11 is that btree indexes can be built in parallel, > and before releasing it we found some bugs with covering indexes. > Perhaps we have an issue hidden behind one of these, but hard to be > sure.
I doubt it. Jeremy did not report queries that give wrong answers. He only said that the optimizer refused to use one particular index, before a VACUUM FULL seemingly corrected the problem. OTOH, Jeremy did report using contrib/amcheck on the index, which didn't complain. (Note also that the amcheck functions will throw an error with an !indisvalid index.) -- Peter Geoghegan