On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Few other things, I would like you to consider. > 1. I think disable_parallel_leader_participation related code can be > extracted into a separate patch as it is mainly a debug/test aid. You can > also fix the problem reported by Mahendra in that context. > > 2. I think if we cam somehow disallow very small indexes to use parallel > workers, then it will be better. Can we use min_parallel_index_scan_size > to decide whether a particular index can participate in a parallel vacuum? > Forgot one minor point. Please run pgindent on all the patches. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
