On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:34 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... or stop using > _mdfd_getseg() for this so that you can remove segments independently > without worrying about sync requests for other segments (it was > actually like that in an earlier version of the patch for commit > 3eb77eba, but someone complained that it didn't benifit from fd > caching).
Not sure which approach I prefer yet, but here's a patch showing that alternative.
0001-Don-t-use-_mdfd_getseg-in-mdsyncfiletag.patch
Description: Binary data
