On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:01 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Here's a rebased version. I remember why I didn't call the column > "offset" (as Michael complained about upthread), it's a keyword...
This never got applied, and that annoyed me again today, so here's a new version that I've whacked around somewhat and propose to commit. I ripped out the stuff pertaining to dynamic shared memory segments, both because I think it might need some more thought and discussion, and because the part the pertains to the main shared memory segment is the part I keep wishing we had. We can add that other part later if we're all agreed on it, but let's go ahead and add this part now. Other things I changed: - Doc edits. - Added REVOKE statements as proposed by Michael (and I agree). - Can't patch pg_proc.h any more, gotta patch pg_proc.dat. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
0001-Add-a-pg_shmem_allocations-view.patch
Description: Binary data
