On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 07:03:52AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > IIUC, if something like Heikki's patch is applied on older branch the > problem will be magically fixed from the extension point of view so > that should be safe (an extension would only need to detect the minor > version to get a more useful error message for users), and all > alternatives are too intrusive to be patckbatched.
So, Heikki, are you planning to work more on that and commit a change close to what has been proposed upthread in [1]? It sounds to me that this has the advantage to be non-intrusive and a similar solution has been used for GIN indexes. Moving the redesign out of the discussion, is there actually a downsize with back-patching something like Heikki's version? Tom, Alvaro and Julien, do you have more thoughts to share? [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b847493e-d263-3f2e-1802-689e778c9...@iki.fi -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
