On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:44 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 6:53 AM Ashwin Agrawal <aagra...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >>> - I wonder if CheckForSerializableConflictOutNeeded() shouldn't have a
> >>>   portion of it's code as a static inline. In particular, it's a shame
> >>>   that we currently perform external function calls at quite the
> >>>   frequency when serializable isn't even in use.
> >>
> >> I am not sure on portion of the code part? SerializationNeededForRead()
> is static inline function in C file. Can't inline
> CheckForSerializableConflictOutNeeded() without moving
> SerializationNeededForRead() and some other variables to header file.
> CheckForSerializableConflictOut() wasn't inline either, so a function call
> was performed earlier as well when serializable isn't even in use.
>
> I agree that it's strange that we do these high frequency function
> calls just to figure out that we're not even using this stuff, which
> ultimately comes down to the static global variable MySerializableXact
> being not reachable from (say) an inline function defined in a header.
> That's something to look into in another thread.
>
> > Attaching re-based version of the patches on top of current master,
> which has the fix for HOT serializable predicate locking bug spotted by
> Andres committed now.
>
> I'm planning to commit these three patches on Monday.  I've attached
> versions with whitespace-only changes from pgindent, and commit
> messages lightly massaged and updated to point to this discussion and
> reviewers.
>

Thanks a lot, sounds good.

Reply via email to