Hi, On 2019-11-06 07:53:09 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > As per feedback in this thread, it seems that for now, it is better, > if we can allow a parallel vacuum only when I/O throttling is not > enabled. We can later extend it based on feedback from the field once > the feature starts getting used.
That's not my read on this thread. I don't think we should introduce this feature without a solution for the throttling. Greetings, Andres Freund
