Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm thinking to commit the patch. But I have one question; is it ok to > back-patch? Since the patch changes the command tags for some commands, > for example, which might break the existing event trigger functions > using TG_TAG if we back-patch it. Or we should guarantee the compatibility of > command tag within the same major version?
I would not back-patch this. I don't think it's enough of a bug to justify taking any compatibility risks for. regards, tom lane