Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2019-11-04 19:04:52 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote: >> Uh, it seems obvious to me that it should be backpatched?
> Fine with me. But I don't think it's just plainly obvious, it's
> essentailly a change in query plans etc, and we've been getting more
> hesitant with those over time.
Since this is happening during create_plan(), it affects no planner
decisions; it's just a pointless inefficiency AFAICS. Back-patching
seems fine.
regards, tom lane
