Hi, (I've not read the rest of this thread yet)
On 2019-11-04 16:07:23 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:39:44PM +0300, Павел Ерёмин wrote: > > And yet, if I try to implement a similar mechanism, if successful, will my > > revision be considered? > > > > Why wouldn't it be considered? If you submit a patch that demonstrably > improves the behavior (in this case reduces per-tuple overhead without > causing significant issues elsewhere), we'd be crazy not to consider it. And "without causing significant issues elsewhere" unfortunately includes continuing to allow pg_upgrade to work. Greetings, Andres Freund
