On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 8:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:17 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Basically, only IndexBulkDeleteResult is now shared across the stage > > > > so we can move all members to GistVacState and completely get rid of > > > > GistBulkDeleteResult? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, something like that would be better. Let's try and see how it comes > > > out. > > I have modified as we discussed. Please take a look. > > > > Thanks, I haven't reviewed this yet, but it seems to be on the right > lines. Sawada-San, can you please prepare the next version of the > parallel vacuum patch on top of this patch and enable parallel vacuum > for Gist indexes?
Yeah I've sent the latest patch set that is built on top of this patch[1]. BTW I looked at this patch briefly but it looks good to me. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBMo9dr_QmhT%3DdKh7fmiq7tpx%2ByLHR8nw9i5NZ-SgtaVg%40mail.gmail.com Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada
