Hi Alvaro,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:56 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2019-Oct-18, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > While reviewing the partitionwise-join patch, I noticed $Subject，ie,
> > this in create_list_bounds():
> >
> > /*
> > * Never put a null into the values array, flag instead for
> > * the code further down below where we construct the actual
> > * relcache struct.
> > */
> > if (null_index != -1)
> > elog(ERROR, "found null more than once");
> > null_index = i;
> >
> > "the code further down below where we construct the actual relcache
> > struct" isn't in the same file anymore by refactoring by commit
> > b52b7dc25. How about modifying it like the attached?
>
> Yeah, agreed. Instead of "the null comes from" I would use "the
> partition that stores nulls".
I think your wording is better than mine. Thank you for reviewing!
> While reviewing your patch I noticed a few places where we use an odd
> pattern in switches, which can be simplified as shown here.
case PARTITION_STRATEGY_LIST:
- num_indexes = bound->ndatums;
+ return bound->ndatums;
break;
Why not remove the break statement?
Other than that the patch looks good to me.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
