On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:10 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > Another idea could be each index AM tell whether it uses > > maintainence_work_mem or not and based on that we can do the > > computation (divide the maintainence_work_mem by the number of such > > indexes during parallel vacuum). > > FWIW, that seems like a perfectly reasonable API addition to me. >
Thanks, Sawada-san, if you also think this API makes sense, then we can try to write a patch and see how it turns out? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
