On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 06:56:48AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-Oct-17, Michael Paquier wrote: >> pgstat_progress_end_command() is done for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY after >> the concurrent drop, so it made sense to me to still report any PID >> REINDEX CONC is waiting for at this stage. > > Yeah, okay. So let's talk about your proposed new comment. First, > there are two spots where WaitForLockers is called in index_drop and > you're proposing to patch the second one. I think we should patch the > first one and reference that one from the second one. I propose > something like this (sorry for crude pasting): > > <comments>
What you are proposing here sounds fine to me. Perhaps you would prefer to adjust the code yourself? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
