Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> ... it seems this patch needs attention, but I'm not sure from whom.
> The tests don't pass whenever the server encoding is not UTF8, so I
> suppose we should either have an alternate expected output file to
> account for that, or the tests should be removed. But anyway the code
> needs to be reviewed.
Yeah, I'm overdue to review it, but other things have taken precedence.
The unportable test is not a problem at this point, since the patch
isn't finished anyway. I'm not sure yet whether it'd be worth
preserving that test case in the final version.
regards, tom lane
