On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:18:59AM +0300, Victor Wagner wrote:
> PostgreSQL 12 documentation states, that minimum required version of
> OpenSSL is 0.9.8. However, I was unable to сompile current
> PGPRO_12_STABLE with OpenSSL 0.9.8j (from SLES 11sp4).

I can reproduce that with REL_12_STABLE and the top of
OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable fromx OpenSSL's git.

> It is not so. Here is exempt from tls1.h header file from the openssl
> 0.9.8j
> 
> #define TLS1_VERSION                    0x0301
> #define TLS1_1_VERSION                  0x0302
> #define TLS1_2_VERSION                  0x0303
> /* TLS 1.1 and 1.2 are not supported by this version of OpenSSL, so
>  * TLS_MAX_VERSION indicates TLS 1.0 regardless of the above
>  * definitions. (s23_clnt.c and s23_srvr.c have an OPENSSL_assert()
>  * check that would catch the error if TLS_MAX_VERSION was too low.)
>  */
> #define TLS_MAX_VERSION                 TLS1_VERSION

Indeed, we rely currently on a false assumption that the version is
supported if the object is defined.  That's clearly wrong.

> Replacing all 
> 
> #ifdef TLS1_1_VERSION
> 
> with
> 
> #if defined(TLS1_1_VERSION) && TLS1_1_VERSION <= TLS_MAX_VERSION
> 
> and analogue for TLS1_2_VERSION fixes the problem.

That sounds like a plan.  

> Really, problem is that symbol SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1 (and 1_2 accordingly)
> might be undefined even if TLS1_1_VERSION defined. 
> 
> Replacing 
> 
> #ifdef TLS1_1_VERSION
> 
> with 
> 
> #ifdef SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1

Hmm.  Wouldn't it be better to check if the maximum version of TLS is
supported and if SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1 is defined (same for 1.2)?

> But there is third (first from start of file) one.
> ...
>                 case PG_TLS1_1_VERSION:
> #ifdef TLS1_1_VERSION
>                         return TLS1_1_VERSION;
> #else
>                         break;
> #endif
> ...
> (line 1290). In this case check for TLS1_1_VERSION <= TLS_MAX_VERSION
> seems to be more self-explanatory, than check for somewhat unrelated 
> symbol SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1

That sounds right.  Victor, would you like to write a patch?
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to