Hi, On 2019-09-22 11:45:05 -0400, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:25 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > >Is there an innocent explanation for this? I thought logical > > >replication > > >slots provided an iron-clad guarantee that WAL would be retained until > > >it > > >was no longer needed. I am just using pub/sub, none of the lower level > > >stuff. > > > > It indeed should. What's the content of > > pg_replication_slot for that slot? > > > > Unfortunately I don't think I have that preserved. If I can reproduce the > issue, would preserving data/pg_replslot/sub/state help as well?
Can't hurt. Best together with other slots, if they exists. Could you describe the system a bit? Greetings, Andres Freund
