On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:48 PM James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:21 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Let me know what you think of attached? I think we can back-patch > > this patch. What do you think? Does anyone else have an opinion on > > this patch especially if we see any problem in back-patching this? > > The attached looks great! > > I was working on HEAD for the patch, but this concern has been an > issue for quite a long time. We were running into it on 9.6 in > production, for example. And given how frequently it seems like there > are large-scale production issues related to auto vacuum, I think any > amount of back patching we can do to make that footgun less likely > would be a good thing. >
Okay, I will commit this tomorrow unless someone has any comments or objections. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
