On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:23:45AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > We always return a single tuple/record from this function, so do we > really need to return SETOF record or just returning record is > sufficient?
Right (with the doc update). > If you want to use the same size array, then you might want to just > memset the previous array rather than first freeing it and then again > allocating it. This is not a big point, so any which way is fine. Sure. This is less expensive though, so changed it the way you are suggesting on my local branch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
