On 2019-Aug-06, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > Revised patch is attached. Changes to \dA+ command are reverted. It > also contains some minor improvements. > > Second patch looks problematic for me, because it provides index > description alternative to \d+. IMHO, if there is something really > useful to display about index, we should keep it in \d+. So, I > propose to postpone this.
Are you saying that we should mark this entire CF entry as Returned with Feedback? Or do you see a subset of your latest 0001 as a commitable patch? Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
