On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:32 PM Nikita Glukhov <n.glu...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On 08.09.2019 22:32, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Alexander Korotkov > > <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> I'm going to push both if no objections. > > So, pushed! > > Two years ago there was a similar patch for this issue: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1499c9d0-075a-3014-d2aa-ba59121b3728%40postgrespro.ru > > Sorry that I looked at this thread too late.
I see, thanks. You patch seems a bit less cumbersome thanks to using GISTDistance struct. You don't have to introduce separate array with null flags. But it's harder too keep index_store_float8_orderby_distances() used by both GiST and SP-GiST. What do you think? You can rebase your patch can propose that as refactoring. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
