Hi,
On 2019-09-05 14:16:11 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-09-04 16:49, fn ln wrote: > > I made another patch for suggested behavior (COMMIT/ROLLBACK AND CHAIN > > now gives us an error when used in an implicit block). > > I'm content with this patch. Would need tests. > Better disable questionable cases now and maybe re-enable them later > if someone wants to make a case for it. I do think the fact that COMMIT in multi-statement implicit transaction has some usecase, is an argument for just implementing it properly... Greetings, Andres Freund
