On 2019-09-04 11:22, Andrey Borodin wrote: >> What about the two patches? Which one is better? > On our observations pglz_decompress_hacked.patch is best for most of tested > platforms. > Difference is that pglz_decompress_hacked8.patch will not appply optimization > if decompressed match is not greater than 8 bytes. This optimization was > suggested by Tom, that's why we benchmarked it specifically.
The patches attached to the message I was replying to are named 0001-Use-memcpy-in-pglz-decompression-for-long-matches.patch 0001-Use-memcpy-in-pglz-decompression.patch Are those the same ones? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
