Greetings, * David Steele (da...@pgmasters.net) wrote: > On 9/3/19 12:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> writes: > >> But now we know that sending it to grand-children is wrong in a > >> sense that that leads to left-alone unwanted core files. But the > >> behavior is already knwon at the time. > > > >> So, Now I know that we need to revert that in certain extent if > >> we want to stop the core-dumping behavior... > > > > Yeah. After thinking about this more, I'm inclined to propose that > > we just change what the postmaster does, as per attached patch. > > > > A couple of questions arise: > > > > * Would it be better to substitute SIGTERM instead of SIGINT? > > The POSIX default handling is the same for both, but some programs > > might interpret them differently. > > I prefer SIGTERM, but FWIW pgBackRest handles them both the same way.
Yeah, I wondered about that too, perhaps SIGTERM is better. I'm not really particular either way. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
