On 2019-Aug-22, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > 22.08.2019 16:13, Paul Guo wrote: > > Thanks. I updated the patch to v5. It passes install-check testing and > > recovery testing. > Hi, > Thank you for working on this fix. > The overall design of the latest version looks good to me. > But during the review, I found a bug in the current implementation. > New behavior must apply to crash-recovery only, now it applies to > archiveRecovery too.
Hello Paul, Kyotaro, are you working on updating this bugfix? FWIW the latest patch submitted by Paul is still current and CFbot says it passes its own test, but from Anastasia's email it still needs a bit of work. Also: it would be good to have this new bogus scenario described by Anastasia covered by a new TAP test. Anastasia, can we enlist you to write that? Maybe Kyotaro? Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
