Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 8/21/19 4:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> Still, if we simply added the skew to the snapshot time that might be
>>> enough to achieve what you want. That would be a one line change, I think.
>> +1
> Done. It's only happening prospectively, so we'll need to wait a few
> days to see it flow through.
Hm, doesn't seem to have done the trick. The current dashboard page shows
(in the v12 branch)
mule ... 01:17 ago OK [97205d0] Config
loach ... 01:32 ago OK [97205d0] Config
dangomushi ... 02:11 ago OK [97205d0] Config
bowerbird ... 02:23 ago scriptsCheck [97205d0] Details
snapper ... 02:48 ago OK [63fc3b1] Config
caiman ... 03:04 ago OK [97205d0] Config
nightjar ... 03:17 ago recoveryCheck [97205d0] Details
chub ... 03:29 ago OK [97205d0] Config
clam ... 03:34 ago OK [97205d0] Config
demoiselle ... 03:45 ago OK [97205d0] Config
snapper is clearly out of line here: the commit it claims
to have fetched 2:48 ago was obsoleted around seven hours ago.
(Snapper is one of the machines that is typically inconsistent
in this way. I've been assuming that's because its system clock
is a few hours off ... but maybe there's something else going on?)
regards, tom lane
