On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:08 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Or maybe we're just being too ambitious here and we should discard some of > this information. I'm not really sure that the format_operator result > can be included without complete loss of intelligibility. > > Thoughts? I'm particularly unclear on how any of this might translate > into other languages, though I doubt that the current text is giving > good guidance to translators.
Can left and right types of pg_amop mismatch to those of pg_operatror? It probably could for domains, any* types or something. But for builtin opclasses they always match. # select * from pg_amop amop join pg_operator op on op.oid = amop.amopopr where amop.amoplefttype != op.oprleft or amop.amoprighttype != op.oprright; (0 rows) Could we discard one pair of types from output? ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
