On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:18:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Hi Tom, > > b654714 has reworked the way we handle removal of CLRF for several > code paths, and has repeated the same code patterns to do that in 8 > different places. Could it make sense to refactor things as per the > attached with a new routine in common/string.c?
Yes, I think this is a good idea. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
