Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> writes: > OK, I have the revert ready. The one thing I'm wondering about is > whether we need to revert log_transaction_sample_rate too? I think it's > pretty much independent feature, so I think we can keep that. Opinions?
Isn't the issue here the interaction between log_transaction_sample_rate
and log_min_duration_statement? Seems like we have that question
regardless of whether log_statement_sample_limit exists.
regards, tom lane
