On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:52 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2019-08-01 22:42:23 +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > Sure, but it requires extra wrapper functions, and the st_changecount > > dance when writing the new value. > > So? You need a wrapper function anyway, there's no way we're going to > add all those separate pg_atomic_write* calls directly.
Ok > I also think this proposed column should probably respect > the track_activities GUC. Oh indeed, I'll fix that when I'll be sure of the semantics to implement.
