Richard Guo <ri...@pivotal.io> writes: > For the third query, a rough investigation shows that, the qual 'sl = > 5' and 'sc.sl = sg.sl' will form an equivalence class and generate two > implied equalities: 'sc.sl = 5' and 'sg.sl = 5', which can be pushed > down to the base rels. One consequence of the deduction is when > constructing restrict lists for the joinrel, we lose the original > restrict 'sc.sl = sg.sl', and this would fail the check > have_partkey_equi_join(), which checks if there exists an equi-join > condition for each pair of partition keys. As a result, this joinrel > would not be considered as an input to further partitionwise joins.
> We need to fix this. Uh ... why? The pushed-down restrictions should result in pruning away any prunable partitions at the scan level, leaving nothing for the partitionwise join code to do. regards, tom lane