On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:39 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:43 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:15 AM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Thanks for checking. There has been a lot of churn in the inheritance > > > planning code since my last email on this thread, so I'd like to > > > reconsider. I'm busy this week with some things, so I'll try posting > > > something on next Tuesday. > > > > > Sounds good. > > I looked at this today and concluded that the problem and the patches > discussed here are fairly isolated from inheritance planning changes > committed to PG 12. > > I've combined the two patches into one. Looks fine to me, moved to ready for committer.
I tried to think up test > cases to go with the code changes, but couldn't come up with one. I am also not sure how to test whether we have access to the statistics of the table. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
