>>The suggested change pares down the "Tip" to more of a brief "Note", which >>IMHO is a bit >>terse for that section of the documentation (which has more of a tutorial >>character), >>and the contents of the original tip basically still apply for volatile >>default values >>anyway. >> >>I've attached another suggestion for rewording this which should also make the >>mechanics of the operation a little clearer.
>Thank you, that better explains it. Looks good to me. Shouldn't we add that to the current commit fest? Regards Daniel
