11.07.2019 21:19, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:34 AM Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghack...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Peter, Rafia, thanks for the review. New version is attached.

+ elog(DEBUG4, "insert_itupprev_to_page. compressState->ntuples %d
IndexTupleSize %zu free %zu",
+ compressState->ntuples, IndexTupleSize(to_insert), PageGetFreeSpace(page));
+
and other such DEBUG4 statements are meant to be removed, right...?
I hope so too.
Yes, these messages are only for debugging.
I haven't delete them since this is still work in progress
and it's handy to be able to print inner details.
Maybe I should also write a patch for pageinspect.

/*
* If we have only 10 uncompressed items on the full page, it probably
* won't worth to compress them.
*/
if (maxoff - n_posting_on_page < 10)
return;

Is this a magic number...?
I think that this should be a constant or something.
Fixed. Now this is a constant in nbtree.h. I'm not 100% sure about the value.
When the code will stabilize we can benchmark it and find optimal value.

/*
* We do not expect to meet any DEAD items, since this function is
* called right after _bt_vacuum_one_page(). If for some reason we
* found dead item, don't compress it, to allow upcoming microvacuum
* or vacuum clean it up.
*/
if (ItemIdIsDead(itemId))
continue;

This makes me wonder about those 'some' reasons.
I think that this is just defensive. Note that _bt_vacuum_one_page()
is prepared to find no dead items, even when the BTP_HAS_GARBAGE flag
is set for the page.
You are right, now it is impossible to meet dead items in this function.
Though it can change in the future if, for example, _bt_vacuum_one_page will behave lazily.
So this is just a sanity check. Maybe it's worth to move it to Assert.


Caller is responsible for checking BTreeTupleIsPosting to ensure that
+ * he will get what he expects

This can be re-framed to make the caller more gender neutral.
Agreed. I also don't like anthropomorphizing code like this.

Fixed.

Other than that, I am curious about the plans for its backward compatibility.
Me too. There is something about a new version 5 in comments in
nbtree.h, but the version number isn't changed. I think that we may be
able to get away with not increasing the B-Tree version from 4 to 5,
actually. Deduplication is performed lazily when it looks like we
might have to split the page, so there isn't any expectation that
tuples will either be compressed or uncompressed in any context.
Current implementation is backward compatible.
To distinguish posting tuples, it only adds one new flag combination.
This combination was never possible before. Comment about version 5 is deleted.

I also added a patch for amcheck.

There is one major issue left - preserving TID order in posting lists.
For a start, I added a sort into BTreeFormPostingTuple function.
It turned out to be not very helpful, because we cannot check this invariant lazily.

Now I work on patching _bt_binsrch_insert() and _bt_insertonpg() to implement insertion into the middle of the posting list. I'll send a new version this week.

--
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

diff --git a/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c b/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
index 9126c18..2b05b1e 100644
--- a/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
+++ b/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
@@ -1033,12 +1033,34 @@ bt_target_page_check(BtreeCheckState *state)
 		{
 			IndexTuple	norm;
 
-			norm = bt_normalize_tuple(state, itup);
-			bloom_add_element(state->filter, (unsigned char *) norm,
-							  IndexTupleSize(norm));
-			/* Be tidy */
-			if (norm != itup)
-				pfree(norm);
+			if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup))
+			{
+				IndexTuple	onetup;
+				int i;
+
+				/* Fingerprint all elements of posting tuple one by one */
+				for (i = 0; i < BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup); i++)
+				{
+					onetup = BTreeGetNthTupleOfPosting(itup, i);
+
+					norm = bt_normalize_tuple(state, onetup);
+					bloom_add_element(state->filter, (unsigned char *) norm,
+									  IndexTupleSize(norm));
+					/* Be tidy */
+					if (norm != onetup)
+						pfree(norm);
+					pfree(onetup);
+				}
+			}
+			else
+			{
+				norm = bt_normalize_tuple(state, itup);
+				bloom_add_element(state->filter, (unsigned char *) norm,
+								  IndexTupleSize(norm));
+				/* Be tidy */
+				if (norm != itup)
+					pfree(norm);
+			}
 		}
 
 		/*
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c
index 602f884..26ddf32 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include "access/tableam.h"
 #include "access/transam.h"
 #include "access/xloginsert.h"
+#include "catalog/catalog.h"
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/predicate.h"
@@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ static void _bt_insert_parent(Relation rel, Buffer buf, Buffer rbuf,
 static bool _bt_pgaddtup(Page page, Size itemsize, IndexTuple itup,
 						 OffsetNumber itup_off);
 static void _bt_vacuum_one_page(Relation rel, Buffer buffer, Relation heapRel);
+static bool insert_itupprev_to_page(Page page, BTCompressState *compressState);
+static void _bt_compress_one_page(Relation rel, Buffer buffer, Relation heapRel);
 
 /*
  *	_bt_doinsert() -- Handle insertion of a single index tuple in the tree.
@@ -759,6 +762,12 @@ _bt_findinsertloc(Relation rel,
 			_bt_vacuum_one_page(rel, insertstate->buf, heapRel);
 			insertstate->bounds_valid = false;
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * If the target page is full, try to compress the page
+		 */
+		if (PageGetFreeSpace(page) < insertstate->itemsz)
+			_bt_compress_one_page(rel, insertstate->buf, heapRel);
 	}
 	else
 	{
@@ -806,6 +815,11 @@ _bt_findinsertloc(Relation rel,
 			}
 
 			/*
+			 * Before considering moving right, try to compress the page
+			 */
+			_bt_compress_one_page(rel, insertstate->buf, heapRel);
+
+			/*
 			 * Nope, so check conditions (b) and (c) enumerated above
 			 *
 			 * The earlier _bt_check_unique() call may well have established a
@@ -2286,3 +2300,241 @@ _bt_vacuum_one_page(Relation rel, Buffer buffer, Relation heapRel)
 	 * the page.
 	 */
 }
+
+/*
+ * Add new item (compressed or not) to the page, while compressing it.
+ * If insertion failed, return false.
+ * Caller should consider this as compression failure and
+ * leave page uncompressed.
+ */
+static bool
+insert_itupprev_to_page(Page page, BTCompressState *compressState)
+{
+	IndexTuple	to_insert;
+	OffsetNumber offnum = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(page);
+
+	if (compressState->ntuples == 0)
+		to_insert = compressState->itupprev;
+	else
+	{
+		IndexTuple	postingtuple;
+
+		/* form a tuple with a posting list */
+		postingtuple = BTreeFormPostingTuple(compressState->itupprev,
+											 compressState->ipd,
+											 compressState->ntuples);
+		to_insert = postingtuple;
+		pfree(compressState->ipd);
+	}
+
+	/* Add the new item into the page */
+	offnum = OffsetNumberNext(offnum);
+
+	elog(DEBUG4, "insert_itupprev_to_page. compressState->ntuples %d IndexTupleSize %zu free %zu",
+		 compressState->ntuples, IndexTupleSize(to_insert), PageGetFreeSpace(page));
+
+	if (PageAddItem(page, (Item) to_insert, IndexTupleSize(to_insert),
+					offnum, false, false) == InvalidOffsetNumber)
+	{
+		elog(DEBUG4, "insert_itupprev_to_page. failed");
+
+		/*
+		 * this may happen if tuple is bigger than freespace fallback to
+		 * uncompressed page case
+		 */
+		if (compressState->ntuples > 0)
+			pfree(to_insert);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (compressState->ntuples > 0)
+		pfree(to_insert);
+	compressState->ntuples = 0;
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Before splitting the page, try to compress items to free some space.
+ * If compression didn't succeed, buffer will contain old state of the page.
+ * This function should be called after lp_dead items
+ * were removed by _bt_vacuum_one_page().
+ */
+static void
+_bt_compress_one_page(Relation rel, Buffer buffer, Relation heapRel)
+{
+	OffsetNumber offnum,
+				minoff,
+				maxoff;
+	Page		page = BufferGetPage(buffer);
+	Page		newpage;
+	BTPageOpaque opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(page);
+	bool		use_compression = false;
+	BTCompressState *compressState = NULL;
+	int			n_posting_on_page = 0;
+	int			natts = IndexRelationGetNumberOfAttributes(rel);
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't use compression for indexes with INCLUDEd columns, system indexes
+	 * and unique indexes.
+	 */
+	use_compression = ((IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(rel) ==
+						IndexRelationGetNumberOfAttributes(rel))
+					   && (!IsSystemRelation(rel))
+					   && (!rel->rd_index->indisunique));
+	if (!use_compression)
+		return;
+
+	/* init compress state needed to build posting tuples */
+	compressState = (BTCompressState *) palloc0(sizeof(BTCompressState));
+	compressState->ipd = NULL;
+	compressState->ntuples = 0;
+	compressState->itupprev = NULL;
+	compressState->maxitemsize = BTMaxItemSize(page);
+	compressState->maxpostingsize = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Scan over all items to see which ones can be compressed
+	 */
+	minoff = P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque);
+	maxoff = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(page);
+
+	/*
+	 * Heuristic to avoid trying to compress page that has already contain
+	 * mostly compressed items
+	 */
+	for (offnum = minoff;
+		 offnum <= maxoff;
+		 offnum = OffsetNumberNext(offnum))
+	{
+		ItemId		itemid = PageGetItemId(page, P_HIKEY);
+		IndexTuple	item = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page, itemid);
+
+		if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(item))
+			n_posting_on_page++;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we have only a few uncompressed items on the full page,
+	 * it isn't worth to compress them
+	 */
+	if (maxoff - n_posting_on_page < BT_COMPRESS_THRESHOLD)
+		return;
+
+	newpage = PageGetTempPageCopySpecial(page);
+	elog(DEBUG4, "_bt_compress_one_page rel: %s,blkno: %u",
+		 RelationGetRelationName(rel), BufferGetBlockNumber(buffer));
+
+	/* Copy High Key if any */
+	if (!P_RIGHTMOST(opaque))
+	{
+		ItemId		itemid = PageGetItemId(page, P_HIKEY);
+		Size		itemsz = ItemIdGetLength(itemid);
+		IndexTuple	item = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page, itemid);
+
+		if (PageAddItem(newpage, (Item) item, itemsz, P_HIKEY,
+						false, false) == InvalidOffsetNumber)
+		{
+			/*
+			 * Should never happen. Anyway, fallback gently to scenario of
+			 * incompressible page and just return from function.
+			 */
+			elog(DEBUG4, "_bt_compress_one_page. failed to insert highkey to newpage");
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Iterate over tuples on the page, try to compress them into posting
+	 * lists and insert into new page.
+	 */
+	for (offnum = minoff;
+		 offnum <= maxoff;
+		 offnum = OffsetNumberNext(offnum))
+	{
+		ItemId		itemId = PageGetItemId(page, offnum);
+		IndexTuple	itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page, itemId);
+
+		/*
+		 * We do not expect to meet any DEAD items, since this function is
+		 * called right after _bt_vacuum_one_page(). If for some reason we
+		 * found dead item, don't compress it, to allow upcoming microvacuum
+		 * or vacuum clean it up.
+		 */
+		if (ItemIdIsDead(itemId))
+			continue;
+
+		if (compressState->itupprev != NULL)
+		{
+			int			n_equal_atts =
+			_bt_keep_natts_fast(rel, compressState->itupprev, itup);
+			int			itup_ntuples = BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup) ?
+			BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup) : 1;
+
+			if (n_equal_atts > natts)
+			{
+				/*
+				 * When tuples are equal, create or update posting.
+				 *
+				 * If posting is too big, insert it on page and continue.
+				 */
+				if (compressState->maxitemsize >
+					MAXALIGN(((IndexTupleSize(compressState->itupprev)
+							   + (compressState->ntuples + itup_ntuples + 1) * sizeof(ItemPointerData)))))
+				{
+					add_item_to_posting(compressState, itup);
+				}
+				else if (!insert_itupprev_to_page(newpage, compressState))
+				{
+					elog(DEBUG4, "_bt_compress_one_page. failed to insert posting");
+					return;
+				}
+			}
+			else
+			{
+				/*
+				 * Tuples are not equal. Insert itupprev into index. Save
+				 * current tuple for the next iteration.
+				 */
+				if (!insert_itupprev_to_page(newpage, compressState))
+				{
+					elog(DEBUG4, "_bt_compress_one_page. failed to insert posting");
+					return;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Copy the tuple into temp variable itupprev to compare it with the
+		 * following tuple and maybe unite them into a posting tuple
+		 */
+		if (compressState->itupprev)
+			pfree(compressState->itupprev);
+		compressState->itupprev = CopyIndexTuple(itup);
+
+		Assert(IndexTupleSize(compressState->itupprev) <= compressState->maxitemsize);
+	}
+
+	/* Handle the last item. */
+	if (!insert_itupprev_to_page(newpage, compressState))
+	{
+		elog(DEBUG4, "_bt_compress_one_page. failed to insert posting for last item");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	START_CRIT_SECTION();
+	PageRestoreTempPage(newpage, page);
+	MarkBufferDirty(buffer);
+
+	/* Log full page write */
+	if (RelationNeedsWAL(rel))
+	{
+		XLogRecPtr	recptr;
+
+		recptr = log_newpage_buffer(buffer, true);
+		PageSetLSN(page, recptr);
+	}
+	END_CRIT_SECTION();
+
+	elog(DEBUG4, "_bt_compress_one_page. success");
+	return;
+}
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c
index 50455db..dff506d 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c
@@ -1022,14 +1022,53 @@ _bt_page_recyclable(Page page)
 void
 _bt_delitems_vacuum(Relation rel, Buffer buf,
 					OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems,
+					OffsetNumber *remainingoffset,
+					IndexTuple *remaining, int nremaining,
 					BlockNumber lastBlockVacuumed)
 {
 	Page		page = BufferGetPage(buf);
 	BTPageOpaque opaque;
+	int			i;
+	Size		itemsz;
+	Size		remaining_sz = 0;
+	char	   *remaining_buf = NULL;
+
+	/* XLOG stuff, buffer for remainings */
+	if (nremaining && RelationNeedsWAL(rel))
+	{
+		Size		offset = 0;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < nremaining; i++)
+			remaining_sz += MAXALIGN(IndexTupleSize(remaining[i]));
+
+		remaining_buf = palloc0(remaining_sz);
+		for (i = 0; i < nremaining; i++)
+		{
+			itemsz = IndexTupleSize(remaining[i]);
+			memcpy(remaining_buf + offset, (char *) remaining[i], itemsz);
+			offset += MAXALIGN(itemsz);
+		}
+		Assert(offset == remaining_sz);
+	}
 
 	/* No ereport(ERROR) until changes are logged */
 	START_CRIT_SECTION();
 
+	/* Handle posting tuples here */
+	for (i = 0; i < nremaining; i++)
+	{
+		/* At first, delete the old tuple. */
+		PageIndexTupleDelete(page, remainingoffset[i]);
+
+		itemsz = IndexTupleSize(remaining[i]);
+		itemsz = MAXALIGN(itemsz);
+
+		/* Add tuple with remaining ItemPointers to the page. */
+		if (PageAddItem(page, (Item) remaining[i], itemsz, remainingoffset[i],
+						false, false) == InvalidOffsetNumber)
+			elog(ERROR, "failed to rewrite compressed item in index while doing vacuum");
+	}
+
 	/* Fix the page */
 	if (nitems > 0)
 		PageIndexMultiDelete(page, itemnos, nitems);
@@ -1059,6 +1098,8 @@ _bt_delitems_vacuum(Relation rel, Buffer buf,
 		xl_btree_vacuum xlrec_vacuum;
 
 		xlrec_vacuum.lastBlockVacuumed = lastBlockVacuumed;
+		xlrec_vacuum.nremaining = nremaining;
+		xlrec_vacuum.ndeleted = nitems;
 
 		XLogBeginInsert();
 		XLogRegisterBuffer(0, buf, REGBUF_STANDARD);
@@ -1072,6 +1113,19 @@ _bt_delitems_vacuum(Relation rel, Buffer buf,
 		if (nitems > 0)
 			XLogRegisterBufData(0, (char *) itemnos, nitems * sizeof(OffsetNumber));
 
+		/*
+		 * Here we should save offnums and remaining tuples themselves. It's
+		 * important to restore them in correct order. At first, we must
+		 * handle remaining tuples and only after that other deleted items.
+		 */
+		if (nremaining > 0)
+		{
+			Assert(remaining_buf != NULL);
+			XLogRegisterBufData(0, (char *) remainingoffset,
+								nremaining * sizeof(OffsetNumber));
+			XLogRegisterBufData(0, remaining_buf, remaining_sz);
+		}
+
 		recptr = XLogInsert(RM_BTREE_ID, XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM);
 
 		PageSetLSN(page, recptr);
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtree.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtree.c
index 4cfd528..11e45c8 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtree.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtree.c
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static void btvacuumscan(IndexVacuumInfo *info, IndexBulkDeleteResult *stats,
 						 BTCycleId cycleid, TransactionId *oldestBtpoXact);
 static void btvacuumpage(BTVacState *vstate, BlockNumber blkno,
 						 BlockNumber orig_blkno);
+static ItemPointer btreevacuumPosting(BTVacState *vstate, IndexTuple itup,
+									  int *nremaining);
 
 
 /*
@@ -1069,7 +1071,8 @@ btvacuumscan(IndexVacuumInfo *info, IndexBulkDeleteResult *stats,
 								 RBM_NORMAL, info->strategy);
 		LockBufferForCleanup(buf);
 		_bt_checkpage(rel, buf);
-		_bt_delitems_vacuum(rel, buf, NULL, 0, vstate.lastBlockVacuumed);
+		_bt_delitems_vacuum(rel, buf, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL, 0,
+							vstate.lastBlockVacuumed);
 		_bt_relbuf(rel, buf);
 	}
 
@@ -1193,6 +1196,9 @@ restart:
 		OffsetNumber offnum,
 					minoff,
 					maxoff;
+		IndexTuple	remaining[MaxOffsetNumber];
+		OffsetNumber remainingoffset[MaxOffsetNumber];
+		int			nremaining;
 
 		/*
 		 * Trade in the initial read lock for a super-exclusive write lock on
@@ -1229,6 +1235,7 @@ restart:
 		 * callback function.
 		 */
 		ndeletable = 0;
+		nremaining = 0;
 		minoff = P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque);
 		maxoff = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(page);
 		if (callback)
@@ -1242,31 +1249,78 @@ restart:
 
 				itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page,
 												PageGetItemId(page, offnum));
-				htup = &(itup->t_tid);
 
-				/*
-				 * During Hot Standby we currently assume that
-				 * XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records do not produce conflicts. That is
-				 * only true as long as the callback function depends only
-				 * upon whether the index tuple refers to heap tuples removed
-				 * in the initial heap scan. When vacuum starts it derives a
-				 * value of OldestXmin. Backends taking later snapshots could
-				 * have a RecentGlobalXmin with a later xid than the vacuum's
-				 * OldestXmin, so it is possible that row versions deleted
-				 * after OldestXmin could be marked as killed by other
-				 * backends. The callback function *could* look at the index
-				 * tuple state in isolation and decide to delete the index
-				 * tuple, though currently it does not. If it ever did, we
-				 * would need to reconsider whether XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records
-				 * should cause conflicts. If they did cause conflicts they
-				 * would be fairly harsh conflicts, since we haven't yet
-				 * worked out a way to pass a useful value for
-				 * latestRemovedXid on the XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records. This
-				 * applies to *any* type of index that marks index tuples as
-				 * killed.
-				 */
-				if (callback(htup, callback_state))
-					deletable[ndeletable++] = offnum;
+				if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup))
+				{
+					int			nnewipd = 0;
+					ItemPointer newipd = NULL;
+
+					newipd = btreevacuumPosting(vstate, itup, &nnewipd);
+
+					if (nnewipd == 0)
+					{
+						/*
+						 * All TIDs from posting list must be deleted, we can
+						 * delete whole tuple in a regular way.
+						 */
+						deletable[ndeletable++] = offnum;
+					}
+					else if (nnewipd == BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup))
+					{
+						/*
+						 * All TIDs from posting tuple must remain. Do
+						 * nothing, just cleanup.
+						 */
+						pfree(newipd);
+					}
+					else if (nnewipd < BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup))
+					{
+						/* Some TIDs from posting tuple must remain. */
+						Assert(nnewipd > 0);
+						Assert(newipd != NULL);
+
+						/*
+						 * Form new tuple that contains only remaining TIDs.
+						 * Remember this tuple and the offset of the old tuple
+						 * to update it in place.
+						 */
+						remainingoffset[nremaining] = offnum;
+						remaining[nremaining] = BTreeFormPostingTuple(itup, newipd, nnewipd);
+						nremaining++;
+						pfree(newipd);
+
+						Assert(IndexTupleSize(itup) <= BTMaxItemSize(page));
+					}
+				}
+				else
+				{
+					htup = &(itup->t_tid);
+
+					/*
+					 * During Hot Standby we currently assume that
+					 * XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records do not produce conflicts.
+					 * That is only true as long as the callback function
+					 * depends only upon whether the index tuple refers to
+					 * heap tuples removed in the initial heap scan. When
+					 * vacuum starts it derives a value of OldestXmin.
+					 * Backends taking later snapshots could have a
+					 * RecentGlobalXmin with a later xid than the vacuum's
+					 * OldestXmin, so it is possible that row versions deleted
+					 * after OldestXmin could be marked as killed by other
+					 * backends. The callback function *could* look at the
+					 * index tuple state in isolation and decide to delete the
+					 * index tuple, though currently it does not. If it ever
+					 * did, we would need to reconsider whether
+					 * XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records should cause conflicts. If
+					 * they did cause conflicts they would be fairly harsh
+					 * conflicts, since we haven't yet worked out a way to
+					 * pass a useful value for latestRemovedXid on the
+					 * XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records. This applies to *any* type
+					 * of index that marks index tuples as killed.
+					 */
+					if (callback(htup, callback_state))
+						deletable[ndeletable++] = offnum;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -1274,7 +1328,7 @@ restart:
 		 * Apply any needed deletes.  We issue just one _bt_delitems_vacuum()
 		 * call per page, so as to minimize WAL traffic.
 		 */
-		if (ndeletable > 0)
+		if (ndeletable > 0 || nremaining > 0)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Notice that the issued XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM WAL record includes
@@ -1291,6 +1345,7 @@ restart:
 			 * that.
 			 */
 			_bt_delitems_vacuum(rel, buf, deletable, ndeletable,
+								remainingoffset, remaining, nremaining,
 								vstate->lastBlockVacuumed);
 
 			/*
@@ -1376,6 +1431,42 @@ restart:
 }
 
 /*
+ * btreevacuumPosting() -- vacuums a posting tuple.
+ *
+ * Returns new palloc'd posting list with remaining items.
+ * Posting list size is returned via nremaining.
+ *
+ * If all items are dead,
+ * nremaining is 0 and resulting posting list is NULL.
+ */
+static ItemPointer
+btreevacuumPosting(BTVacState *vstate, IndexTuple itup, int *nremaining)
+{
+	int			i,
+				remaining = 0;
+	int			nitem = BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup);
+	ItemPointer tmpitems = NULL,
+				items = BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check each tuple in the posting list, save alive tuples into tmpitems
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < nitem; i++)
+	{
+		if (vstate->callback(items + i, vstate->callback_state))
+			continue;
+
+		if (tmpitems == NULL)
+			tmpitems = palloc(sizeof(ItemPointerData) * nitem);
+
+		tmpitems[remaining++] = items[i];
+	}
+
+	*nremaining = remaining;
+	return tmpitems;
+}
+
+/*
  *	btcanreturn() -- Check whether btree indexes support index-only scans.
  *
  * btrees always do, so this is trivial.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c
index c655dad..49a1aae 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ static bool _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir,
 						 OffsetNumber offnum);
 static void _bt_saveitem(BTScanOpaque so, int itemIndex,
 						 OffsetNumber offnum, IndexTuple itup);
+static void _bt_savePostingitem(BTScanOpaque so, int itemIndex,
+								OffsetNumber offnum, ItemPointer iptr,
+								IndexTuple itup, int i);
 static bool _bt_steppage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir);
 static bool _bt_readnextpage(IndexScanDesc scan, BlockNumber blkno, ScanDirection dir);
 static bool _bt_parallel_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, BlockNumber blkno,
@@ -665,6 +668,9 @@ _bt_compare(Relation rel,
 	 * Use the heap TID attribute and scantid to try to break the tie.  The
 	 * rules are the same as any other key attribute -- only the
 	 * representation differs.
+	 * TODO when itup is a posting tuple, the check becomes more complex.
+	 * we have an option that key nor smaller, nor larger than the tuple,
+	 * but exactly in between of BTreeTupleGetMinTID to BTreeTupleGetMaxTID.
 	 */
 	heapTid = BTreeTupleGetHeapTID(itup);
 	if (key->scantid == NULL)
@@ -1410,6 +1416,7 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 	int			itemIndex;
 	bool		continuescan;
 	int			indnatts;
+	int			i;
 
 	/*
 	 * We must have the buffer pinned and locked, but the usual macro can't be
@@ -1456,6 +1463,7 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 
 	/* initialize tuple workspace to empty */
 	so->currPos.nextTupleOffset = 0;
+	so->currPos.prevTupleOffset = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Now that the current page has been made consistent, the macro should be
@@ -1490,8 +1498,22 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 			if (_bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir, &continuescan))
 			{
 				/* tuple passes all scan key conditions, so remember it */
-				_bt_saveitem(so, itemIndex, offnum, itup);
-				itemIndex++;
+				if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup))
+				{
+					for (i = 0; i < BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup); i++)
+					{
+						_bt_savePostingitem(so, itemIndex, offnum,
+											BTreeTupleGetPostingN(itup, i),
+											itup, i);
+						itemIndex++;
+					}
+				}
+				else
+				{
+					_bt_saveitem(so, itemIndex, offnum, itup);
+					itemIndex++;
+				}
+
 			}
 			/* When !continuescan, there can't be any more matches, so stop */
 			if (!continuescan)
@@ -1524,7 +1546,7 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 		if (!continuescan)
 			so->currPos.moreRight = false;
 
-		Assert(itemIndex <= MaxIndexTuplesPerPage);
+		Assert(itemIndex <= MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage);
 		so->currPos.firstItem = 0;
 		so->currPos.lastItem = itemIndex - 1;
 		so->currPos.itemIndex = 0;
@@ -1532,7 +1554,7 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 	else
 	{
 		/* load items[] in descending order */
-		itemIndex = MaxIndexTuplesPerPage;
+		itemIndex = MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage;
 
 		offnum = Min(offnum, maxoff);
 
@@ -1574,8 +1596,22 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 			if (passes_quals && tuple_alive)
 			{
 				/* tuple passes all scan key conditions, so remember it */
-				itemIndex--;
-				_bt_saveitem(so, itemIndex, offnum, itup);
+				if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup))
+				{
+					for (i = 0; i < BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup); i++)
+					{
+						itemIndex--;
+						_bt_savePostingitem(so, itemIndex, offnum,
+											BTreeTupleGetPostingN(itup, i),
+											itup, i);
+					}
+				}
+				else
+				{
+					itemIndex--;
+					_bt_saveitem(so, itemIndex, offnum, itup);
+				}
+
 			}
 			if (!continuescan)
 			{
@@ -1589,8 +1625,8 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum)
 
 		Assert(itemIndex >= 0);
 		so->currPos.firstItem = itemIndex;
-		so->currPos.lastItem = MaxIndexTuplesPerPage - 1;
-		so->currPos.itemIndex = MaxIndexTuplesPerPage - 1;
+		so->currPos.lastItem = MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage - 1;
+		so->currPos.itemIndex = MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage - 1;
 	}
 
 	return (so->currPos.firstItem <= so->currPos.lastItem);
@@ -1603,6 +1639,8 @@ _bt_saveitem(BTScanOpaque so, int itemIndex,
 {
 	BTScanPosItem *currItem = &so->currPos.items[itemIndex];
 
+	Assert(!BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup));
+
 	currItem->heapTid = itup->t_tid;
 	currItem->indexOffset = offnum;
 	if (so->currTuples)
@@ -1615,6 +1653,33 @@ _bt_saveitem(BTScanOpaque so, int itemIndex,
 	}
 }
 
+/* Save an index item into so->currPos.items[itemIndex] for posting tuples. */
+static void
+_bt_savePostingitem(BTScanOpaque so, int itemIndex, OffsetNumber offnum,
+					ItemPointer iptr, IndexTuple itup, int i)
+{
+	BTScanPosItem *currItem = &so->currPos.items[itemIndex];
+
+	currItem->heapTid = *iptr;
+	currItem->indexOffset = offnum;
+
+	if (so->currTuples)
+	{
+		if (i == 0)
+		{
+			/* save key. the same for all tuples in the posting */
+			Size		itupsz = BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(itup);
+
+			currItem->tupleOffset = so->currPos.nextTupleOffset;
+			memcpy(so->currTuples + so->currPos.nextTupleOffset, itup, itupsz);
+			so->currPos.nextTupleOffset += MAXALIGN(itupsz);
+			so->currPos.prevTupleOffset = currItem->tupleOffset;
+		}
+		else
+			currItem->tupleOffset = so->currPos.prevTupleOffset;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  *	_bt_steppage() -- Step to next page containing valid data for scan
  *
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsort.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsort.c
index d0b9013..955a628 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsort.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsort.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
 #include "access/xact.h"
 #include "access/xlog.h"
 #include "access/xloginsert.h"
+#include "catalog/catalog.h"
 #include "catalog/index.h"
 #include "commands/progress.h"
 #include "miscadmin.h"
@@ -288,6 +289,9 @@ static void _bt_sortaddtup(Page page, Size itemsize,
 static void _bt_buildadd(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state,
 						 IndexTuple itup);
 static void _bt_uppershutdown(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state);
+static void insert_itupprev_to_page_buildadd(BTWriteState *wstate,
+											 BTPageState *state,
+											 BTCompressState *compressState);
 static void _bt_load(BTWriteState *wstate,
 					 BTSpool *btspool, BTSpool *btspool2);
 static void _bt_begin_parallel(BTBuildState *buildstate, bool isconcurrent,
@@ -972,6 +976,11 @@ _bt_buildadd(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state, IndexTuple itup)
 			 * only shift the line pointer array back and forth, and overwrite
 			 * the tuple space previously occupied by oitup.  This is fairly
 			 * cheap.
+			 *
+			 * If lastleft tuple was a posting tuple, we'll truncate its
+			 * posting list in _bt_truncate as well. Note that it is also
+			 * applicable only to leaf pages, since internal pages never
+			 * contain posting tuples.
 			 */
 			ii = PageGetItemId(opage, OffsetNumberPrev(last_off));
 			lastleft = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(opage, ii);
@@ -1011,6 +1020,7 @@ _bt_buildadd(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state, IndexTuple itup)
 		 * the minimum key for the new page.
 		 */
 		state->btps_minkey = CopyIndexTuple(oitup);
+		Assert(!BTreeTupleIsPosting(state->btps_minkey));
 
 		/*
 		 * Set the sibling links for both pages.
@@ -1050,8 +1060,36 @@ _bt_buildadd(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state, IndexTuple itup)
 	if (last_off == P_HIKEY)
 	{
 		Assert(state->btps_minkey == NULL);
-		state->btps_minkey = CopyIndexTuple(itup);
-		/* _bt_sortaddtup() will perform full truncation later */
+
+		/*
+		 * Stashed copy must be a non-posting tuple, with truncated posting
+		 * list and correct t_tid since we're going to use it to build
+		 * downlink.
+		 */
+		if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup))
+		{
+			Size		keytupsz;
+			IndexTuple	keytup;
+
+			/*
+			 * Form key tuple, that doesn't contain any ipd. NOTE: since we'll
+			 * need TID later, set t_tid to the first t_tid from posting list.
+			 */
+			keytupsz = BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(itup);
+			keytup = palloc0(keytupsz);
+			memcpy(keytup, itup, keytupsz);
+
+			keytup->t_info &= ~INDEX_SIZE_MASK;
+			keytup->t_info |= keytupsz;
+			ItemPointerCopy(BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup), &keytup->t_tid);
+			state->btps_minkey = CopyIndexTuple(keytup);
+			pfree(keytup);
+		}
+		else
+			state->btps_minkey = CopyIndexTuple(itup);	/* _bt_sortaddtup() will
+														 * perform full
+														 * truncation later */
+
 		BTreeTupleSetNAtts(state->btps_minkey, 0);
 	}
 
@@ -1137,6 +1175,89 @@ _bt_uppershutdown(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Add new tuple (posting or non-posting) to the page, while building index.
+ */
+void
+insert_itupprev_to_page_buildadd(BTWriteState *wstate, BTPageState *state,
+								 BTCompressState *compressState)
+{
+	IndexTuple	to_insert;
+
+	/* Return, if there is no tuple to insert */
+	if (state == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	if (compressState->ntuples == 0)
+		to_insert = compressState->itupprev;
+	else
+	{
+		IndexTuple	postingtuple;
+
+		/* form a tuple with a posting list */
+		postingtuple = BTreeFormPostingTuple(compressState->itupprev,
+											 compressState->ipd,
+											 compressState->ntuples);
+		to_insert = postingtuple;
+		pfree(compressState->ipd);
+	}
+
+	_bt_buildadd(wstate, state, to_insert);
+
+	if (compressState->ntuples > 0)
+		pfree(to_insert);
+	compressState->ntuples = 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Save item pointer(s) of itup to the posting list in compressState.
+ * Helper function for bt_load() and _bt_compress_one_page().
+ *
+ * Note: caller is responsible for size check to ensure that
+ * resulting tuple won't exceed BTMaxItemSize.
+ */
+void
+add_item_to_posting(BTCompressState *compressState, IndexTuple itup)
+{
+	int			nposting = 0;
+
+	if (compressState->ntuples == 0)
+	{
+		compressState->ipd = palloc0(compressState->maxitemsize);
+
+		if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(compressState->itupprev))
+		{
+			/* if itupprev is posting, add all its TIDs to the posting list */
+			nposting = BTreeTupleGetNPosting(compressState->itupprev);
+			memcpy(compressState->ipd, BTreeTupleGetPosting(compressState->itupprev),
+				   sizeof(ItemPointerData) * nposting);
+			compressState->ntuples += nposting;
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			memcpy(compressState->ipd, compressState->itupprev,
+				   sizeof(ItemPointerData));
+			compressState->ntuples++;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup))
+	{
+		/* if tuple is posting, add all its TIDs to the posting list */
+		nposting = BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup);
+		memcpy(compressState->ipd + compressState->ntuples,
+			   BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup),
+			   sizeof(ItemPointerData) * nposting);
+		compressState->ntuples += nposting;
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		memcpy(compressState->ipd + compressState->ntuples, itup,
+			   sizeof(ItemPointerData));
+		compressState->ntuples++;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
  * Read tuples in correct sort order from tuplesort, and load them into
  * btree leaves.
  */
@@ -1150,9 +1271,21 @@ _bt_load(BTWriteState *wstate, BTSpool *btspool, BTSpool *btspool2)
 	bool		load1;
 	TupleDesc	tupdes = RelationGetDescr(wstate->index);
 	int			i,
-				keysz = IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(wstate->index);
+				keysz = IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(wstate->index),
+				natts = IndexRelationGetNumberOfAttributes(wstate->index);
 	SortSupport sortKeys;
 	int64		tuples_done = 0;
+	bool		use_compression = false;
+	BTCompressState *compressState = NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't use compression for indexes with INCLUDEd columns, system indexes
+	 * and unique indexes.
+	 */
+	use_compression = ((IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(wstate->index) ==
+						IndexRelationGetNumberOfAttributes(wstate->index))
+					   && (!IsSystemRelation(wstate->index))
+					   && (!wstate->index->rd_index->indisunique));
 
 	if (merge)
 	{
@@ -1266,19 +1399,88 @@ _bt_load(BTWriteState *wstate, BTSpool *btspool, BTSpool *btspool2)
 	}
 	else
 	{
-		/* merge is unnecessary */
-		while ((itup = tuplesort_getindextuple(btspool->sortstate,
-											   true)) != NULL)
+		if (!use_compression)
 		{
-			/* When we see first tuple, create first index page */
-			if (state == NULL)
-				state = _bt_pagestate(wstate, 0);
+			/* merge is unnecessary */
+			while ((itup = tuplesort_getindextuple(btspool->sortstate,
+												   true)) != NULL)
+			{
+				/* When we see first tuple, create first index page */
+				if (state == NULL)
+					state = _bt_pagestate(wstate, 0);
 
-			_bt_buildadd(wstate, state, itup);
+				_bt_buildadd(wstate, state, itup);
 
-			/* Report progress */
-			pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_CREATEIDX_TUPLES_DONE,
-										 ++tuples_done);
+				/* Report progress */
+				pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_CREATEIDX_TUPLES_DONE,
+											 ++tuples_done);
+			}
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			/* init compress state needed to build posting tuples */
+			compressState = (BTCompressState *) palloc0(sizeof(BTCompressState));
+			compressState->ipd = NULL;
+			compressState->ntuples = 0;
+			compressState->itupprev = NULL;
+			compressState->maxitemsize = 0;
+			compressState->maxpostingsize = 0;
+
+			while ((itup = tuplesort_getindextuple(btspool->sortstate,
+												   true)) != NULL)
+			{
+				/* When we see first tuple, create first index page */
+				if (state == NULL)
+				{
+					state = _bt_pagestate(wstate, 0);
+					compressState->maxitemsize = BTMaxItemSize(state->btps_page);
+				}
+
+				if (compressState->itupprev != NULL)
+				{
+					int			n_equal_atts = _bt_keep_natts_fast(wstate->index,
+																   compressState->itupprev, itup);
+
+					if (n_equal_atts > natts)
+					{
+						/*
+						 * Tuples are equal. Create or update posting.
+						 *
+						 * Else If posting is too big, insert it on page and
+						 * continue.
+						 */
+						if ((compressState->ntuples + 1) * sizeof(ItemPointerData) <
+							compressState->maxpostingsize)
+							add_item_to_posting(compressState, itup);
+						else
+							insert_itupprev_to_page_buildadd(wstate, state, compressState);
+					}
+					else
+					{
+						/*
+						 * Tuples are not equal. Insert itupprev into index.
+						 * Save current tuple for the next iteration.
+						 */
+						insert_itupprev_to_page_buildadd(wstate, state, compressState);
+					}
+				}
+
+				/*
+				 * Save the tuple to compare it with the next one and maybe
+				 * unite them into a posting tuple.
+				 */
+				if (compressState->itupprev)
+					pfree(compressState->itupprev);
+				compressState->itupprev = CopyIndexTuple(itup);
+
+				/* compute max size of posting list */
+				compressState->maxpostingsize = compressState->maxitemsize -
+					IndexInfoFindDataOffset(compressState->itupprev->t_info) -
+					MAXALIGN(IndexTupleSize(compressState->itupprev));
+			}
+
+			/* Handle the last item */
+			insert_itupprev_to_page_buildadd(wstate, state, compressState);
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c
index 93fab26..0da6fa8 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c
@@ -1787,7 +1787,9 @@ _bt_killitems(IndexScanDesc scan)
 			ItemId		iid = PageGetItemId(page, offnum);
 			IndexTuple	ituple = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page, iid);
 
-			if (ItemPointerEquals(&ituple->t_tid, &kitem->heapTid))
+			/* No microvacuum for posting tuples */
+			if (!BTreeTupleIsPosting(ituple) &&
+				(ItemPointerEquals(&ituple->t_tid, &kitem->heapTid)))
 			{
 				/* found the item */
 				ItemIdMarkDead(iid);
@@ -2145,6 +2147,16 @@ _bt_truncate(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
 
 		pivot = index_truncate_tuple(itupdesc, firstright, keepnatts);
 
+		if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(firstright))
+		{
+			BTreeTupleClearBtIsPosting(pivot);
+			BTreeTupleSetNAtts(pivot, keepnatts);
+			pivot->t_info &= ~INDEX_SIZE_MASK;
+			pivot->t_info |= BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(firstright);
+		}
+
+		Assert(!BTreeTupleIsPosting(pivot));
+
 		/*
 		 * If there is a distinguishing key attribute within new pivot tuple,
 		 * there is no need to add an explicit heap TID attribute
@@ -2168,6 +2180,27 @@ _bt_truncate(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
 		pfree(pivot);
 		pivot = tidpivot;
 	}
+	else if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(firstright))
+	{
+		/*
+		 * No truncation was possible, since key attributes are all equal. But
+		 * the tuple is a compressed tuple with a posting list, so we still
+		 * must truncate it.
+		 *
+		 * It's necessary to add a heap TID attribute to the new pivot tuple.
+		 */
+		newsize = BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(firstright) +
+			MAXALIGN(sizeof(ItemPointerData));
+		pivot = palloc0(newsize);
+		memcpy(pivot, firstright, BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(firstright));
+
+		pivot->t_info &= ~INDEX_SIZE_MASK;
+		pivot->t_info |= newsize;
+		BTreeTupleClearBtIsPosting(pivot);
+		BTreeTupleSetAltHeapTID(pivot);
+
+		Assert(!BTreeTupleIsPosting(pivot));
+	}
 	else
 	{
 		/*
@@ -2205,7 +2238,7 @@ _bt_truncate(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
 	 */
 	pivotheaptid = (ItemPointer) ((char *) pivot + newsize -
 								  sizeof(ItemPointerData));
-	ItemPointerCopy(&lastleft->t_tid, pivotheaptid);
+	ItemPointerCopy(BTreeTupleGetMaxTID(lastleft), pivotheaptid);
 
 	/*
 	 * Lehman and Yao require that the downlink to the right page, which is to
@@ -2216,9 +2249,12 @@ _bt_truncate(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
 	 * tiebreaker.
 	 */
 #ifndef DEBUG_NO_TRUNCATE
-	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(&lastleft->t_tid, &firstright->t_tid) < 0);
-	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(pivotheaptid, &lastleft->t_tid) >= 0);
-	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(pivotheaptid, &firstright->t_tid) < 0);
+	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(BTreeTupleGetMaxTID(lastleft),
+							  BTreeTupleGetMinTID(firstright)) < 0);
+	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(pivotheaptid,
+							  BTreeTupleGetMinTID(lastleft)) >= 0);
+	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(pivotheaptid,
+							  BTreeTupleGetMinTID(firstright)) < 0);
 #else
 
 	/*
@@ -2231,7 +2267,7 @@ _bt_truncate(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
 	 * attribute values along with lastleft's heap TID value when lastleft's
 	 * TID happens to be greater than firstright's TID.
 	 */
-	ItemPointerCopy(&firstright->t_tid, pivotheaptid);
+	ItemPointerCopy(BTreeTupleGetMinTID(firstright), pivotheaptid);
 
 	/*
 	 * Pivot heap TID should never be fully equal to firstright.  Note that
@@ -2240,7 +2276,8 @@ _bt_truncate(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
 	 */
 	ItemPointerSetOffsetNumber(pivotheaptid,
 							   OffsetNumberPrev(ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(pivotheaptid)));
-	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(pivotheaptid, &firstright->t_tid) < 0);
+	Assert(ItemPointerCompare(pivotheaptid,
+							  BTreeTupleGetMinTID(firstright)) < 0);
 #endif
 
 	BTreeTupleSetNAtts(pivot, nkeyatts);
@@ -2330,6 +2367,10 @@ _bt_keep_natts(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright,
  * leaving excessive amounts of free space on either side of page split.
  * Callers can rely on the fact that attributes considered equal here are
  * definitely also equal according to _bt_keep_natts.
+ *
+ * To build a posting tuple we need to ensure that all attributes
+ * of both tuples are equal. Use this function to compare them.
+ * TODO: maybe it's worth to rename the function.
  */
 int
 _bt_keep_natts_fast(Relation rel, IndexTuple lastleft, IndexTuple firstright)
@@ -2415,7 +2456,7 @@ _bt_check_natts(Relation rel, bool heapkeyspace, Page page, OffsetNumber offnum)
 			 * Non-pivot tuples currently never use alternative heap TID
 			 * representation -- even those within heapkeyspace indexes
 			 */
-			if ((itup->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK) != 0)
+			if (BTreeTupleIsPivot(itup))
 				return false;
 
 			/*
@@ -2470,7 +2511,7 @@ _bt_check_natts(Relation rel, bool heapkeyspace, Page page, OffsetNumber offnum)
 			 * that to decide if the tuple is a pre-v11 tuple.
 			 */
 			return tupnatts == 0 ||
-				((itup->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK) == 0 &&
+				(!BTreeTupleIsPivot(itup) &&
 				 ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(&(itup->t_tid)) == P_HIKEY);
 		}
 		else
@@ -2497,7 +2538,7 @@ _bt_check_natts(Relation rel, bool heapkeyspace, Page page, OffsetNumber offnum)
 	 * heapkeyspace index pivot tuples, regardless of whether or not there are
 	 * non-key attributes.
 	 */
-	if ((itup->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK) == 0)
+	if (!BTreeTupleIsPivot(itup))
 		return false;
 
 	/*
@@ -2549,6 +2590,8 @@ _bt_check_third_page(Relation rel, Relation heap, bool needheaptidspace,
 	if (!needheaptidspace && itemsz <= BTMaxItemSizeNoHeapTid(page))
 		return;
 
+	/* TODO correct error messages for posting tuples */
+
 	/*
 	 * Internal page insertions cannot fail here, because that would mean that
 	 * an earlier leaf level insertion that should have failed didn't
@@ -2575,3 +2618,79 @@ _bt_check_third_page(Relation rel, Relation heap, bool needheaptidspace,
 					 "or use full text indexing."),
 			 errtableconstraint(heap, RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
 }
+
+/*
+ * Given a basic tuple that contains key datum and posting list,
+ * build a posting tuple.
+ *
+ * Basic tuple can be a posting tuple, but we only use key part of it,
+ * all ItemPointers must be passed via ipd.
+ *
+ * If nipd == 1 fallback to building a non-posting tuple.
+ * It is necessary to avoid storage overhead after posting tuple was vacuumed.
+ */
+IndexTuple
+BTreeFormPostingTuple(IndexTuple tuple, ItemPointerData *ipd, int nipd)
+{
+	uint32		keysize,
+				newsize = 0;
+	IndexTuple	itup;
+
+	/* We only need key part of the tuple */
+	if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(tuple))
+		keysize = BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(tuple);
+	else
+		keysize = IndexTupleSize(tuple);
+
+	Assert(nipd > 0);
+
+	/* Add space needed for posting list */
+	if (nipd > 1)
+		newsize = SHORTALIGN(keysize) + sizeof(ItemPointerData) * nipd;
+	else
+		newsize = keysize;
+
+	newsize = MAXALIGN(newsize);
+	itup = palloc0(newsize);
+	memcpy(itup, tuple, keysize);
+	itup->t_info &= ~INDEX_SIZE_MASK;
+	itup->t_info |= newsize;
+
+	if (nipd > 1)
+	{
+		/* Form posting tuple, fill posting fields */
+
+		/* Set meta info about the posting list */
+		itup->t_info |= INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK;
+		BTreeSetPostingMeta(itup, nipd, SHORTALIGN(keysize));
+
+		/* sort the list to preserve TID order invariant */
+		qsort((void *) ipd, nipd, sizeof(ItemPointerData),
+		  (int (*) (const void *, const void *)) ItemPointerCompare);
+
+		/* Copy posting list into the posting tuple */
+		memcpy(BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup), ipd,
+			   sizeof(ItemPointerData) * nipd);
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		/* To finish building of a non-posting tuple, copy TID from ipd */
+		itup->t_info &= ~INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK;
+		ItemPointerCopy(ipd, &itup->t_tid);
+	}
+
+	return itup;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Opposite of BTreeFormPostingTuple.
+ * returns regular tuple that contains the key,
+ * the tid of the new tuple is the nth tid of original tuple's posting list
+ * result tuple palloc'd in a caller's context.
+ */
+IndexTuple
+BTreeGetNthTupleOfPosting(IndexTuple tuple, int n)
+{
+	Assert(BTreeTupleIsPosting(tuple));
+	return BTreeFormPostingTuple(tuple, BTreeTupleGetPostingN(tuple, n), 1);
+}
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtxlog.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtxlog.c
index 3147ea4..7daadc9 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtxlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtxlog.c
@@ -384,8 +384,8 @@ btree_xlog_vacuum(XLogReaderState *record)
 	Buffer		buffer;
 	Page		page;
 	BTPageOpaque opaque;
-#ifdef UNUSED
 	xl_btree_vacuum *xlrec = (xl_btree_vacuum *) XLogRecGetData(record);
+#ifdef UNUSED
 
 	/*
 	 * This section of code is thought to be no longer needed, after analysis
@@ -476,14 +476,35 @@ btree_xlog_vacuum(XLogReaderState *record)
 
 		if (len > 0)
 		{
-			OffsetNumber *unused;
-			OffsetNumber *unend;
+			if (xlrec->nremaining)
+			{
+				int			i;
+				OffsetNumber *remainingoffset;
+				IndexTuple	remaining;
+				Size		itemsz;
+
+				remainingoffset = (OffsetNumber *)
+					(ptr + xlrec->ndeleted * sizeof(OffsetNumber));
+				remaining = (IndexTuple) ((char *) remainingoffset +
+										  xlrec->nremaining * sizeof(OffsetNumber));
 
-			unused = (OffsetNumber *) ptr;
-			unend = (OffsetNumber *) ((char *) ptr + len);
+				/* Handle posting tuples */
+				for (i = 0; i < xlrec->nremaining; i++)
+				{
+					PageIndexTupleDelete(page, remainingoffset[i]);
+
+					itemsz = MAXALIGN(IndexTupleSize(remaining));
+
+					if (PageAddItem(page, (Item) remaining, itemsz, remainingoffset[i],
+									false, false) == InvalidOffsetNumber)
+						elog(PANIC, "btree_xlog_vacuum: failed to add remaining item");
+
+					remaining = (IndexTuple) ((char *) remaining + itemsz);
+				}
+			}
 
-			if ((unend - unused) > 0)
-				PageIndexMultiDelete(page, unused, unend - unused);
+			if (xlrec->ndeleted)
+				PageIndexMultiDelete(page, (OffsetNumber *) ptr, xlrec->ndeleted);
 		}
 
 		/*
diff --git a/src/include/access/itup.h b/src/include/access/itup.h
index 744ffb6..85ee040 100644
--- a/src/include/access/itup.h
+++ b/src/include/access/itup.h
@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ typedef IndexAttributeBitMapData * IndexAttributeBitMap;
  * On such a page, N tuples could take one MAXALIGN quantum less space than
  * estimated here, seemingly allowing one more tuple than estimated here.
  * But such a page always has at least MAXALIGN special space, so we're safe.
+ *
+ * Note: btree leaf pages may contain posting tuples, which store duplicates
+ * in a more effective way, so they may contain more tuples.
+ * Use MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage instead.
+
  */
 #define MaxIndexTuplesPerPage	\
 	((int) ((BLCKSZ - SizeOfPageHeaderData) / \
diff --git a/src/include/access/nbtree.h b/src/include/access/nbtree.h
index a3583f2..7d0d456 100644
--- a/src/include/access/nbtree.h
+++ b/src/include/access/nbtree.h
@@ -234,8 +234,7 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
  *  t_tid | t_info | key values | INCLUDE columns, if any
  *
  * t_tid points to the heap TID, which is a tiebreaker key column as of
- * BTREE_VERSION 4.  Currently, the INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK status bit is never
- * set for non-pivot tuples.
+ * BTREE_VERSION 4.
  *
  * All other types of index tuples ("pivot" tuples) only have key columns,
  * since pivot tuples only exist to represent how the key space is
@@ -252,6 +251,39 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
  * omitted rather than truncated, since its representation is different to
  * the non-pivot representation.)
  *
+ * Non-pivot posting tuple format:
+ *  t_tid | t_info | key values | INCLUDE columns, if any | posting_list[]
+ *
+ * In order to store duplicated keys more effectively,
+ * we use special format of tuples - posting tuples.
+ * posting_list is an array of ItemPointerData.
+ *
+ * This type of compression never applies to system indexes, unique indexes
+ * or indexes with INCLUDEd columns.
+ *
+ * To differ posting tuples we use INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK flag in t_info and
+ * BT_IS_POSTING flag in t_tid.
+ * These flags redefine the content of the posting tuple's tid:
+ * - t_tid.ip_blkid contains offset of the posting list.
+ * - t_tid offset field contains number of posting items this tuple contain
+ *
+ * The 12 least significant offset bits from t_tid are used to represent
+ * the number of posting items in posting tuples, leaving 4 status
+ * bits (BT_RESERVED_OFFSET_MASK bits), 3 of which that are reserved for
+ * future use.
+ * BT_N_POSTING_OFFSET_MASK is large enough to store any number of posting
+ * tuples, which is constrainted by BTMaxItemSize.
+
+ * If page contains so many duplicates, that they do not fit into one posting
+ * tuple (bounded by BTMaxItemSize and ), page may contain several posting
+ * tuples with the same key.
+ * Also page can contain both posting and non-posting tuples with the same key.
+ * Currently, posting tuples always contain at least two TIDs in the posting
+ * list.
+ *
+ * Posting tuples always have the same number of attributes as the index has
+ * generally.
+ *
  * Pivot tuple format:
  *
  *  t_tid | t_info | key values | [heap TID]
@@ -281,23 +313,157 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
  * bits (BT_RESERVED_OFFSET_MASK bits), 3 of which that are reserved for
  * future use.  BT_N_KEYS_OFFSET_MASK should be large enough to store any
  * number of columns/attributes <= INDEX_MAX_KEYS.
+ * BT_IS_POSTING bit must be unset for pivot tuples, since we use it
+ * to distinct posting tuples from pivot tuples.
  *
  * Note well: The macros that deal with the number of attributes in tuples
- * assume that a tuple with INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK set must be a pivot tuple,
- * and that a tuple without INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK set must be a non-pivot
- * tuple (or must have the same number of attributes as the index has
- * generally in the case of !heapkeyspace indexes).  They will need to be
- * updated if non-pivot tuples ever get taught to use INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK
- * for something else.
+ * assume that a tuple with INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK set must be a pivot tuple or
+ * non-pivot posting tuple, and that a tuple without INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK set
+ * must be a non-pivot tuple (or must have the same number of attributes as
+ * the index has generally in the case of !heapkeyspace indexes).
  */
 #define INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK			INDEX_AM_RESERVED_BIT
 
 /* Item pointer offset bits */
 #define BT_RESERVED_OFFSET_MASK		0xF000
 #define BT_N_KEYS_OFFSET_MASK		0x0FFF
+#define BT_N_POSTING_OFFSET_MASK	0x0FFF
 #define BT_HEAP_TID_ATTR			0x1000
+#define BT_IS_POSTING				0x2000
+
+#define BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup)  \
+	( \
+		((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK && \
+		((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING) != 0))\
+	)
+
+#define BTreeTupleIsPivot(itup)  \
+	( \
+		((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK && \
+		((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING) == 0))\
+	)
+
+/*
+ * MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage is an upper bound on the number of tuples
+ * that can fit on one btree leaf page.
+ *
+ * Btree leaf pages may contain posting tuples, which store duplicates
+ * in a more effective way, so MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage is larger then
+ * MaxIndexTuplesPerPage.
+ *
+ * Each leaf page must contain at least three items, so estimate it as
+ * if we have three posting tuples with minimal size keys.
+ */
+#define MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage \
+	((int) ((BLCKSZ - SizeOfPageHeaderData - \
+			3*((MAXALIGN(sizeof(IndexTupleData) + 1) + sizeof(ItemIdData))) )) / \
+			(sizeof(ItemPointerData)))
 
-/* Get/set downlink block number */
+/*
+ * Btree-private state needed to build posting tuples.
+ * ipd is a posting list - an array of ItemPointerData.
+ *
+ * Iterating over tuples during index build or applying compression to a
+ * single page, we remember a tuple in itupprev, then compare the next one
+ * with it. If tuples are equal, save their TIDs in the posting list.
+ * ntuples contains the size of the posting list.
+ *
+ * Use maxitemsize and maxpostingsize to ensure that resulting posting tuple
+ * will satisfy BTMaxItemSize.
+ */
+typedef struct BTCompressState
+{
+	Size		maxitemsize;
+	Size		maxpostingsize;
+	IndexTuple	itupprev;
+	int			ntuples;
+	ItemPointerData *ipd;
+} BTCompressState;
+
+/*
+ * For use in _bt_compress_one_page().
+ * If there is only a few uncompressed items on a page,
+ * it isn't worth to apply compression.
+ * Currently it is just a magic number,
+ * proper benchmarking will probably help to choose better value.
+ */
+#define BT_COMPRESS_THRESHOLD 10
+
+/* macros to work with posting tuples *BEGIN* */
+#define BTreeTupleSetBtIsPosting(itup) \
+	do { \
+		Assert((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK); \
+		Assert(!((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING) != 0)); \
+		ItemPointerSetOffsetNumber(&(itup)->t_tid, \
+			ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) | BT_IS_POSTING); \
+	} while(0)
+
+#define BTreeTupleClearBtIsPosting(itup) \
+	do { \
+		ItemPointerSetOffsetNumber(&(itup)->t_tid, \
+		ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & ~BT_IS_POSTING); \
+	} while(0)
+
+#define BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup)	\
+	( \
+		ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_N_POSTING_OFFSET_MASK \
+	)
+
+#define BTreeTupleSetNPosting(itup, n) \
+	do { \
+		ItemPointerSetOffsetNumber(&(itup)->t_tid, (n) & BT_N_POSTING_OFFSET_MASK); \
+		BTreeTupleSetBtIsPosting(itup); \
+	} while(0)
+
+/*
+ * If tuple is posting, t_tid.ip_blkid contains offset of the posting list.
+ * Caller is responsible for checking BTreeTupleIsPosting to ensure that
+ * it will get what he expects
+ */
+#define BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(itup) \
+	ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(&((itup)->t_tid))
+#define BTreeTupleSetPostingOffset(itup, offset) \
+	ItemPointerSetBlockNumber(&((itup)->t_tid), (offset))
+
+#define BTreeSetPostingMeta(itup, nposting, off) \
+	do { \
+		BTreeTupleSetNPosting(itup, nposting); \
+		BTreeTupleSetPostingOffset(itup, off); \
+	} while(0)
+
+#define BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup) \
+	(ItemPointerData*) ((char*)(itup) + BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(itup))
+#define BTreeTupleGetPostingN(itup,n) \
+	(ItemPointerData*) (BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup) + (n))
+
+/*
+ * Posting tuples always contain several TIDs.
+ * Some functions that use TID as a tiebreaker,
+ * to ensure correct order of TID keys they can use two macros below:
+ */
+#define BTreeTupleGetMinTID(itup) \
+	( \
+		((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK && \
+		((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING))) ? \
+		( \
+			(ItemPointer) BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup) \
+		) \
+		: \
+		(ItemPointer) &((itup)->t_tid) \
+	)
+#define BTreeTupleGetMaxTID(itup) \
+	( \
+		((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK && \
+		((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING))) ? \
+		( \
+			(ItemPointer) (BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup) + (BTreeTupleGetNPosting(itup)-1)) \
+		) \
+		: \
+		(ItemPointer) &((itup)->t_tid) \
+	)
+/* macros to work with posting tuples *END* */
+
+/* Get/set downlink block number  */
 #define BTreeInnerTupleGetDownLink(itup) \
 	ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(&((itup)->t_tid))
 #define BTreeInnerTupleSetDownLink(itup, blkno) \
@@ -326,7 +492,8 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
  */
 #define BTreeTupleGetNAtts(itup, rel)	\
 	( \
-		(itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK ? \
+		((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK && \
+		((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING) == 0)) ? \
 		( \
 			ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_N_KEYS_OFFSET_MASK \
 		) \
@@ -335,6 +502,7 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
 	)
 #define BTreeTupleSetNAtts(itup, n) \
 	do { \
+		Assert(!BTreeTupleIsPosting(itup)); \
 		(itup)->t_info |= INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK; \
 		ItemPointerSetOffsetNumber(&(itup)->t_tid, (n) & BT_N_KEYS_OFFSET_MASK); \
 	} while(0)
@@ -342,6 +510,8 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
 /*
  * Get tiebreaker heap TID attribute, if any.  Macro works with both pivot
  * and non-pivot tuples, despite differences in how heap TID is represented.
+ *
+ * For non-pivot posting tuple it returns the first tid from posting list.
  */
 #define BTreeTupleGetHeapTID(itup) \
 	( \
@@ -351,7 +521,10 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
 		(ItemPointer) (((char *) (itup) + IndexTupleSize(itup)) - \
 					   sizeof(ItemPointerData)) \
 	  ) \
-	  : (itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK ? NULL : (ItemPointer) &((itup)->t_tid) \
+	  : (itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK ? \
+		(((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING) != 0) ? \
+		(ItemPointer) BTreeTupleGetPosting(itup) : NULL) \
+		: (ItemPointer) &((itup)->t_tid) \
 	)
 /*
  * Set the heap TID attribute for a tuple that uses the INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK
@@ -360,6 +533,7 @@ typedef struct BTMetaPageData
 #define BTreeTupleSetAltHeapTID(itup) \
 	do { \
 		Assert((itup)->t_info & INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK); \
+		Assert(!((ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) & BT_IS_POSTING) != 0)); \
 		ItemPointerSetOffsetNumber(&(itup)->t_tid, \
 								   ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&(itup)->t_tid) | BT_HEAP_TID_ATTR); \
 	} while(0)
@@ -567,6 +741,8 @@ typedef struct BTScanPosData
 	 * location in the associated tuple storage workspace.
 	 */
 	int			nextTupleOffset;
+	/* prevTupleOffset is for posting list handling */
+	int			prevTupleOffset;
 
 	/*
 	 * The items array is always ordered in index order (ie, increasing
@@ -579,7 +755,7 @@ typedef struct BTScanPosData
 	int			lastItem;		/* last valid index in items[] */
 	int			itemIndex;		/* current index in items[] */
 
-	BTScanPosItem items[MaxIndexTuplesPerPage]; /* MUST BE LAST */
+	BTScanPosItem items[MaxPostingIndexTuplesPerPage];	/* MUST BE LAST */
 } BTScanPosData;
 
 typedef BTScanPosData *BTScanPos;
@@ -763,6 +939,8 @@ extern void _bt_delitems_delete(Relation rel, Buffer buf,
 								OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems, Relation heapRel);
 extern void _bt_delitems_vacuum(Relation rel, Buffer buf,
 								OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems,
+								OffsetNumber *remainingoffset,
+								IndexTuple *remaining, int nremaining,
 								BlockNumber lastBlockVacuumed);
 extern int	_bt_pagedel(Relation rel, Buffer buf);
 
@@ -813,6 +991,9 @@ extern bool _bt_check_natts(Relation rel, bool heapkeyspace, Page page,
 							OffsetNumber offnum);
 extern void _bt_check_third_page(Relation rel, Relation heap,
 								 bool needheaptidspace, Page page, IndexTuple newtup);
+extern IndexTuple BTreeFormPostingTuple(IndexTuple tuple, ItemPointerData *ipd,
+										int nipd);
+extern IndexTuple BTreeGetNthTupleOfPosting(IndexTuple tuple, int n);
 
 /*
  * prototypes for functions in nbtvalidate.c
@@ -825,5 +1006,7 @@ extern bool btvalidate(Oid opclassoid);
 extern IndexBuildResult *btbuild(Relation heap, Relation index,
 								 struct IndexInfo *indexInfo);
 extern void _bt_parallel_build_main(dsm_segment *seg, shm_toc *toc);
+extern void add_item_to_posting(BTCompressState *compressState,
+								IndexTuple itup);
 
 #endif							/* NBTREE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/access/nbtxlog.h b/src/include/access/nbtxlog.h
index 9beccc8..6f60ca5 100644
--- a/src/include/access/nbtxlog.h
+++ b/src/include/access/nbtxlog.h
@@ -173,10 +173,19 @@ typedef struct xl_btree_vacuum
 {
 	BlockNumber lastBlockVacuumed;
 
-	/* TARGET OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW */
+	/*
+	 * This field helps us to find beginning of the remaining tuples from
+	 * postings which follow array of offset numbers.
+	 */
+	uint32		nremaining;
+	uint32		ndeleted;
+
+	/* REMAINING OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW (nremaining values) */
+	/* REMAINING TUPLES TO INSERT FOLLOW (if nremaining > 0) */
+	/* TARGET OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW (if any) */
 } xl_btree_vacuum;
 
-#define SizeOfBtreeVacuum	(offsetof(xl_btree_vacuum, lastBlockVacuumed) + sizeof(BlockNumber))
+#define SizeOfBtreeVacuum	(offsetof(xl_btree_vacuum, ndeleted) + sizeof(BlockNumber))
 
 /*
  * This is what we need to know about marking an empty branch for deletion.

Reply via email to