On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 3:58 AM Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > The attached patch does $SUBJECT, as a showcase for recently added > features, including advanced expressions (CASE...), \if, \gset, ending SQL > commands at ";"...
Hi Fabien, + the account branch has a 15% probability to be in the same branch as the teller (unless I would say "... has a 15% probability of being in the same ...". The same wording appears further down in the comment. I see that the parameters you propose match the TPCB 2.0 description[1], and the account balance was indeed supposed to be returned to the driver. I wonder if "strict" is the right name here though. "tpcb-like-2" at least leaves room for someone to propose yet another variant, and still includes the "-like" disclaimer, which I interpret as a way of making it clear that this benchmark and results produced by it have no official TPC audited status. > There is also a small fix to the doc which describes the tpcb-like > implementation but gets one variable name wrong: balance -> delta. Agreed. I committed that part. Thanks! [1] http://www.tpc.org/tpcb/spec/tpcb_current.pdf -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
