On 2019-Jul-08, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:29 AM Tatsuro Yamada > <tatsuro.yamada...@nttcom.co.jp> wrote: > > 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387|scanning table|4425|4425 > > 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387|analyzing sample|0|0 > > 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387||0|0 <-- Is it Okay?? > > Why do we zero out the block numbers when we switch phases? The > CREATE INDEX progress reporting patch does that kind of thing too, and > it seems like poor behavior to me.
Yeah, I got the impression that that was determined to be the desirable behavior, so I made it do that, but I'm not really happy about it either. We're not too late to change the CREATE INDEX behavior, but let's discuss what is it that we want. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
