On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:56:25PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:34 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > On 2019-Jan-30, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > > > I wonder if it can be considered as acceptable solution of the problem or > > > there can be some better approach? > > > > I didn't find one. > > It sounds like you are in agreement that there is a problem and this > is the best solution. I didn't look at these patches, I'm just asking > with my Commitfest manager hat on: did I understand correctly, does > this need a TAP test, possibly the one Alvaro posted, and if so, could > we please have a fresh patch that includes the test, so we can see it > passing the test in CI?
Please note that I have not looked at that stuff in details, but I find the patch proposed kind of ugly with the scan of the last segment using a WAL reader to find out what is the last LSN and react on that.. This does not feel right. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
