> On 2 Jul 2019, at 22:16, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > even if we made a test case that presumed > --enable-nls and tried to exercise this, the lack of translations > for the new words would get in the way for a long while.
For testing though, couldn’t we have an autogenerated .po which has a unique and predictable dummy value translation for every string (the string backwards or something), which can be used for testing? This is all hand-wavy since I haven’t tried actually doing it, but it seems a better option than waiting for .po files to be available. Or am I missing the point of the value of the discussed test? cheers ./daniel
