Greetings, * Ian Barwick (ian.barw...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > However, going back to the original scenario (cascaded standby set up using > "pg_basebackup --write-recovery-conf") there would now be a warning emitted > the first time anyone executes ALTER SYSTEM (about duplicate > "primary_conninfo" > entries) which would not have occured in Pg11 and earlier (and which will > no doubt cause consternation along the lines "how did my postgresql.auto.conf > get modified in an unexpected way? OMG? Bug? Was I hacked?").
No, I don't think we should end up in a situation where this happens. I agree that this implies making pg_basebackup more intelligent when it's dealing with that file but I simply don't have a lot of sympathy about that, it's not news to anyone who has been paying attention. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
