Hello, 13.06.2019 11:10, Michael Paquier wrote: > The last trace of tss_htup has been removed as of 2e3da03, and I see > no mention of it in the related thread. Andres, is that intentional > for table AMs to keep a trace of a currently-fetched tuple for a TID > scan or something that can be removed? The field is still > documented, so the patch is incomplete if we finish by removing the > field. And my take is that we should keep it. Andres, I've found another unused structure field "was_xmin" in the was_running structure, having the following comment: * Outdated: This struct isn't used for its original purpose anymore, but * can't be removed / changed in a minor version, because it's stored * on-disk. This comment lives here since 955a684e, May 13 2017. Shouldn't the outdated structure be removed in v12?
Best regards, Alexander
